top of page
  • Writer's pictureKaty Craig

STUXNET and Meta's New Online Operations Kill Chain


A pivotal moment in the history of cyberwarfare was the Stuxnet incident. In 2010, researchers found the highly advanced computer worm known as Stuxnet. It specifically targeted the industrial control systems used in Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities. The worm was created with the intention of damaging the centrifuges used in uranium enrichment and ultimately halting Iran's nuclear program.


Stuxnet is widely thought to have been developed by the United States and Israel as part of a covert operation against Iran's nuclear program, despite the fact that no government has officially claimed responsibility for it. I mapped what I know about the worm to Meta's new online operations kill chain, which uses phase analysis of ten steps to find the earliest point to disrupt an attack, in order to better understand the attack. Results are as follows:


Meta's Kill Chain and Stuxnet Chain of Events

Acquiring assets:

In the context of Stuxnet, this step might involve acquiring the technical knowledge, human resources, and tools necessary for creating the worm. This probably included knowledge of Siemens programmable logic controllers (PLCs), Step7 software, and zero-day exploits. This also covers the stealing of valid certificates to be used in masking the network worm.

Disguising assets:

This action may involve hiding the true source of the attack, perhaps by obscuring the creators' identities and employing advanced methods to make the worm's origins difficult to pinpoint. It was difficult to detect due to the use of valid certificates and zero days.

Information gathering:

This step corresponds to the traditional cyber kill chain's reconnaissance phase. This required intensive study of the Iranian nuclear program, industrial control systems, and the particular Siemens PLCs used in the uranium enrichment process for Stuxnet. In order to play back "all conditions normal" and avoid detection, it had to include knowledge of the monitoring system.

Coordinating and planning:

This step entails developing a strategic plan for deploying Stuxnet, including identifying the initial delivery method, the worm's propagation strategy, and the desired effects on the target systems. Stuxnet was specifically designed to infect Siemens PLCs running Windows Step7 software.

Testing platform defenses:

Before launching the attack, the developers of Stuxnet would have likely tested the worm against various defenses, including antivirus software, firewalls, and intrusion detection systems, to ensure its effectiveness and stealth. They also tested its ability to determine whether the PLC met the target requirements for launching the payload.

Evading detection:

Stuxnet was designed to avoid detection by using multiple zero-day exploits, advanced rootkit techniques, and other methods to remain hidden within the target systems.

Indiscriminate engagement:

Although Stuxnet was ultimately a targeted attack, the worm was theorized to have been left indiscriminately in USB drives for infection to systems connected to the targeted network. This allowed it to reach its intended target without arousing suspicion.

Targeted engagement:

Once Stuxnet reached the intended industrial control systems, it specifically targeted the Siemens PLCs Step7 software responsible for controlling the centrifuges in Iran's nuclear facilities, subtly manipulating their operations to cause damage while reporting to operators that all conditions in the plant were normal.

Compromising assets:

This step refers to the successful infiltration and control of the targeted systems. Stuxnet achieved this by exploiting multiple vulnerabilities in the industrial control systems and establishing a foothold.

Enabling longevity:

To maintain its presence in the target systems, Stuxnet was designed to function autonomously and discreetly. It reported all conditions normal even as the centrifuges were spinning out of control. It had the capability to receive updates from a command server, which allowed the attackers to modify its behavior if necessary, further ensuring its longevity within the infected systems.


Use of Stolen (Legitimate) Certificates

Stuxnet used stolen digital certificates to help evade detection and increase its chances of successful infiltration. The worm utilized certificates from two legitimate Taiwanese companies, JMicron and Realtek Semiconductor Corp. These certificates were used to sign the malware's drivers, making the malicious code appear more trustworthy and less likely to be flagged by security software, and enabling several phases in this kill chain.


By using these stolen certificates, Stuxnet was able to bypass certain security measures, such as Windows' driver signature enforcement, which requires drivers to be signed by a trusted certificate authority to be loaded by the operating system. This allowed Stuxnet to install its rootkit components with elevated privileges, helping them remain hidden on the infected systems.


The Stuxnet incident serves as a powerful example of a highly sophisticated cyberattack, demonstrating the potential for nation-states to use advanced cyberweapons to target and disrupt critical infrastructure. The Meta Online Operations Kill Chain is also a useful tool for helping cyber professionals understand the anatomy of an online attack targeted at humans.


23 views
bottom of page